aerostack

Search Aerostack

Norwegian

Rydoo Accounts Payable AI invoice automation at Norwegian

MidAmerica St. Louis

GoodMaps indoor navigation at MidAmerica St. Louis Airport

Lyon Saint-Exupéry Airport

Stan robotic valet parking at Lyon Saint-Exupéry

London Heathrow

Facial-recognition eGates at Heathrow

Almaty International Airport

Q-Gate biometric passport-control terminals at Almaty

Pittsburgh International Airport

Arrow Analytics EZ-Board computer-vision carry-on analytics test at PIT Gate A7

Federal Aviation Administration

FAA SMART airspace and trajectory management platform

Dubai International

Dubai Police AI systems for passenger screening, unattended baggage and camera analysis at Dubai airports

London Heathrow

UCL machine-learning forecasts of transfer and security passenger flows at Heathrow

Passenger-flow analytics · Supplier: In-house

Current reported state

Deployed

Heathrow's Airport Operations Centre uses machine-learning forecasts developed with University College London to predict transfer passengers' connection times and the number of passengers arriving at immigration and security. According to UCL's REF 2021 impact case study, the work was led by Professor Bert De Reyck, first tested in a live trial on 19 July 2016 and implemented in 2017.

The models produce quantile forecasts, a predicted spread of likely outcomes instead of a single number, both for each transferring passenger and for aggregate flows. The case study says operations managers use them to identify passengers likely to be late for connections, alert airlines and ground staff, and adjust resourcing at immigration and security in 15-minute intervals.

UCL reports that a back-testing study found cost reductions of between 12% and 54% at immigration and security compared with Heathrow's legacy system. That is a back-tested estimate, not a measured operating result; the case study also reports that the model's accuracy beat the historical averages Heathrow previously relied on.

The evidence is the REF 2021 submission, which UCL published on its impact pages in April 2022. Heathrow has not said publicly whether the system is still used in this form.

What supports the record?

Sources are attached to individual claims. An operator statement supports a reported status; it does not, on its own, establish an independently measured benefit.

Grade A · Date pending

UCL REF 2021 impact case study

Supports the reported status: Deployed.

Source evidence

Live data from the Aerostack register. Status reflects published evidence only. See Our approach for how records are graded.

Aerostack tracks AI deployments across airports and airlines, with the published evidence behind each record. Photography is real aviation imagery. Record thumbnails may show the named airport or airline; other photographs do not.